FREEDOM
AND CAPITALISM
By
Lawrence Wilson, MD
© April 2008,
The Center For Development
THE IMPORTANCE OF FREEDOM
This is a short philosophical
article about the virtues of freedom. The most important quality needed for development of the human being,
or for that matter any being, is the ability to think and make decisions on
oneÕs own. This is a basic
principle. If people are cooped up
and told what to do day and night, they do not learn as much, they do not have
the opportunity to make mistakes and suffer the consequences and they generally
do not think very much. As a
result, they do not develop spiritually because learning to think clearly and
carefully, and suffering the consequences of oneÕs actions and behavior are
critical parts of mental and spiritual development.
This is also why
freedom works in the world. It and
it alone allows people to progress, to think, to make decisions, to fail and
then to learn from their mistakes.
Nations such as communist Russia, Cuba, North Korea, Iran and many
others that deny people the freedom to think and make decisions usually do not
last long. These nations are
socialist, which means a large, powerful government makes most of the
decisions. The people are treated
more like caged animals in a zoo who are given ÔbenefitsÕ by the government
that are supposedly doled out equally to all, even though this is never really
the case, in practice. In reality,
those who have friends in high places get the most benefits, and the society is
not egalitarian, even though that is what is claimed.
I begin this article
with this premise that people should have the right and freedom to basically do
as they please, provided they do not harm others, for the maximum amount of
spiritual and mental development.
If the reader does not agree with this principle, then donÕt read
further because the rest of the article is based on this premise.
LOVE
AND CAPITALISM
One
of the main problems with Marxism, socialism, communism and fascism is these
systems of economics and politics are based solely on fear, not on love. If one loves others, one allows others
to have freedom, individual rights, and the ability to earn money and keep what
they earn. Those who are fearful
cannot allow others to have as many individual rights and freedoms because they
fear the masses, they fear the power of the people and they fear that somehow
things will go wrong if one trusts the peopleÕs instincts instead of their own.
This
is the basic difference between Marxism and capitalism at the very deepest
level. It is a choice between love
and fear, a principle that is spiritual at its very roots.
THE ROLE OF THE GOVERNMENT
Governments should
help their people develop themselves, and this is why freedom in any sphere is
ultimately helpful, while slavery, welfare, or servitude in any form is
ultimately harmful to a society.
One of the great
secrets of America, at least in the past, has been the lack of welfare and the
development of the citizenÕs own self-reliance. An important part of this has been the allowing of citizens
to own land, to operate businesses and to fail if conditions or decisions are
incorrect. This system of
economics is called free market capitalism. Our nation was founded with these principles, and the people
have prospered enormously when the principles were adhered to. Let us examine this economic system in
more detail.
FREE MARKET CAPITALISM
Capitalism is the
economic system used today to some degree in many nations of the world. Its qualities consists of three major
tenets:
1. People are free to own property, even
if that is a push cart or a vegetable stand in a marketplace.
2. People are allowed
to earn money by making a ÒprofitÓ.
Profit is the difference between what you buy something for and what you
sell it for. So if a person has a
vegetable stand and they buy carrots for $1.00 a bundle and sell them for $2.00
a bundle, the profit is one dollar per bundle. With this profit, the person pays all the expenses of
traveling to the market, buying his products, and other expenses, and hopefully
has some leftover with which to buy other goods and services. This is the essence of capitalism and
profit.
3. People are allowed
to keep what they earn. They may
pay taxes, but they are generally allowed to keep most of their money.
Other Qualities. Each
person is also liable for any problems that arise from their business, and all
compete with each other for business on an equal footing. In other words, in free market
capitalism, the government should not fund or subsidize or treat anyone
differently than anyone else.
Also, the government does not Òbail outÓ anyone, there is no welfare
system and people must find their own way, their own employment and their own
food and lodging.
In other words, the
role of the government in the economic sphere is simply to be a ÒrefereeÓ to
maintain a level playing field for all business activity, to make laws to maintain
that level playing field, and to catch and bring to justice anyone who violates
those laws, such as thieves, liars, murderers, those who steal ideas that are
trade marked or copyrighted, and so on.
The laws are there to protect the right of each person to do his
business as he sees fit, as long as each person does not violate the economic
and political rights of anyone else.
This is very important today to understand that the government can
function mainly as a referee and a law enforcer, NOT as a provider of goods,
services, welfare, subsidies, favors and other things that are subject to
political whim and power groups.
This economic system,
though it is more than an economic system, was first elaborated in detail by
men such as Adam Smith, in a famous book, The Wealth Of Nations.
Dr. Smith studied the most successful nations and realized that all
shared these basic principles of commerce. He put the whole thing together and coined a lot of the
terms we take for granted today in economics.
One of the most
famous was the Òhidden hand of the marketÓ. It is actually quite brilliant. It is the idea that if there is any good or service that is
needed in society, people will pay more for it and this will attract people he
called entrepreneurs into this business, no matter what it is. It could be garbage collection or
dishwashing, for example. But if
it is needed, the price will go up and more people will begin to offer the
service, until the price comes down and then others will not do this, but will
choose another line of work where the demand is greater.
This concept works in
practice, but most people have trouble trusting it. Government, in particular, often like to meddle in the
marketplace by favoring certain industries or certain companies. This always causes problems, but
governments persist in this because special interests, as they are called,
often influence the congress of all nations to favor or oppose, at times even
outlawing, certain industries.
In this regard,
capitalism is a very complex, self-regulating economic system. Few people understand this, so they are
always trying to meddle and ÔfixÕ what seem to by ÔsymptomsÕ of problems with
it, such as how to care for the poor or ill, or what to do about pollution, for
example. Let us discuss these
problems with capitalism.
THE SEEMING HARSHNESS OF CAPITALISM
Seemingly exploiting the workers. Karl Marx wrote his thesis, Das
Capital, based on what he believed was the Òexploitation of the workersÓ
by the capitalist bosses. They rode
around in fancy carriages, while the workers toiled in the factories for low
wages. This is one aspect of the
harshness of capitalism. Of
course, what Marx did not understand is that the workers had few other
choices. In other words, they
could work just as hard or harder on the farms, perhaps, for even less money,
or they could be beggars and have an even worse life. He did not understand that human progress is slow, and the
factory life, while certainly not ideal, offered the working people more, so
they flocked to it by the millions and are still doing so all over the world
for exactly the same reasons.
The harshness of allowing a business to fail. It seems so harsh, so inhuman, some
would say, to allow a business to fail.
It puts thousands or more out of work, for example. The resources must be sold off at auction
prices and sometimes the creditors of the business are the seeming victims as
well. They may not get paid for
their services and they might fail as well.
The public seems to
lose out, too, if an important type of business like a bank or General Motors
fails. Depositors at the bank may
lose their money, for example.
People who have bought General Motors cars might now be able to have
them serviced properly if the company fails. This is one seeming type of harshness and inhumanity of free market
capitalism.
The response to this
criticism must be understood clearly.
It is that 1) all economic activity has risk. One cannot simply deny the risk by bailing out every failure. If one does this, failure becomes the
new standard and no one will try very hard to succeed. This is exactly what has happened with
our banks, today, and with General Motors today. They have much less incentive to try hard to do a good job
and earn money because they believe they will be bailed out, also called Ôtoo
big to failÕ. This is, in fact,
nothing but corruption at high levels of government. If banks or anyone cannot act responsibly, they should fail
and others would buy up their assets at bargain prices and do a better
job. That is the way things are
done in market economies, and it works well if one leaves the system
alone. Only corruption causes
bailouts. I am familiar with the
arguments that our national security and all depend on big banks and big car
companies. I reject all of
this. I think these are lies told
to the public. Once again, the
principle works that if one company fails, others will buy up their assets and
continue their production, if it is economically viable. If it is not viable, then it should
fail because why produce products and services that no one wants?
POLLUTION
Another criticism of
capitalism is that it causes irresponsible pollution of the air, water and
everything else. This is
completely untrue. First, in true
capitalism, companies are totally responsible for their property and any damage
they do the property of others.
Thus, if they pollute the air, water or land, they are totally
responsible. They would be sued
out of business for polluting the property of others. Sadly, environmental laws have been passed that exempt
corporations from this responsibility in many cases. As a result, companies are allowed to dump a certain amount
of waste products, for example, without consequence. This is one cause of
pollution in many cases, and is the result of corruption, not capitalism.
Another
aspect of pollution is the fact that in a capitalist nation, new technology
that is cleaner will always win out over older, polluting technology, providing
it is cost effective. This does
not happen enough in America and everywhere else because too many laws protect
the old technologies. For example,
the internal combustion engine probably would be on the scrapheap of history
except for the fact that laws actually protect its use in automobiles,
mainly. I know of a man who was
running his car on other fuels and was arrested and told he could not use his
alternative system. These laws, of
which there are many, such as oil depletion allowances and others, are the
product of corruption and the oil cartel, among other groups. This is not capitalism, but corruption
and cartel politics.
It is incorrect to
blame capitalism, when the very people who are punished by these laws are often
the entepreneurs or capitalists, and the ones who
punish them are the cartel or monopolists, who are basically socialists in
disguise because they are people who want total control of the oil or health or
some other marketplace, so they pass licensing and other restrictive laws that
the car companies and everyone else must abide by or go to jail. There is nothing like this allowed in a
capitalist society.
UNEVEN DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH
This
is another criticism of free market capitalism. Some become very rich, while others remain or it seems, are
made poor by the system. This is
the main objection of the socialists to capitalism.
On
the surface, this criticism seems valid.
Pure capitalism seems like a totally selfish system in which one looks
out for oneself to get whatever one can financially. However, this is not true. The reason is that in a capitalist system, the only way one
gets paid is to offer a product or service that others want and therefore are
willing to pay for. This is a
great secret of business that is sometimes expressed as Òthe customer is always
rightÓ. In other words, one must
look out for others, not just for oneself. This fact is overlooked by the socialists. As a result, in fact, in socialist
nations the people are much worse off because the leaders, who claim to want to
do for the people, do not know and often do not care what the people really
want. Instead, they give the
people what they, the leaders, think the people want or should have, and not
what the people really want. In
other words, capitalism is usually must less selfish and narrow-minded than
socialized or command economies in which a central authority dictates which
products and services will exist and their prices.
Now,
it is true that in capitalist nations, some become much wealthier than
others. However, the reason for
this are important to consider. An
important reason this occurs is that some are willing to work harder. Socialist systems favor laziness, in
contrast. The willingness to work
hard is a great benefit for society, so it would make sense that these people
are paid more for their efforts.
One
must not just work harder to make more money. One must also
work in a way that satisfies peopleÕs needs. In a capitalist system, working hard at building products
that no one wants does not make one money, in other words. One must also use oneÕs brain and other
abilities in a way that satisfies the needs of the people. This, too, is a benefit, in general, so
it makes sense these people would receive more compensation.
What
occurs today, however, is often due to corruption. For example, certain industries have passed laws that
exclude others or give themselves special tax breaks. These include the oil industry, the real estate industry,
the medical industry and others.
So people who work in these industries often make a lot of money even if
they donÕt work hard or satisfy peopleÕs real needs. However, this is not a problem with capitalism, but a
problem with human integrity and not allowing pure capitalism to exist in
America and elsewhere because the government tinkers with it for various
reasons.
WHAT ABOUT CARING FOR THE POOR AND THOSE WHO
ARE DISABLED OR OLD OR CANNOT WORK FOR SOME REASON?
This
is another criticism of capitalism.
It takes the attitude that if you donÕt work, you donÕt eat. This is true. Capitalism is about the production of goods and services in
the most efficient manner. It must
be coupled with a moral code, such as that in the bible, that commands people
to love their neighbors as themselves, and to care for others. What occurs in pure capitalist nations,
and used to occur more in America when capitalism was purer, is the devlopment of private welfare. Whether organized by churches or other civic groups and
associations, groups spring up everywhere to care for the poor, the sick, the
old, the disabled and other who cannot produce economically. This fact is not taught in schools, but
is the absolute truth. The idea
that the poor will just languish on the streets without government intervention
is a complete lie that is repeated endlessly on television and in the
universities today.
In fact, private
welfare, private hospital care and private old age care tend to assist people
to develop themselves spiritually much more than the entitlement mentality of a
so-called right to health care and welfare that many believe in today. This is
discussed in another article on this website called What is Compassion? What is
Charity?
CONCLUSION
The moral dimension
of human beings is the most important one, as stated earlier. Capitalism, for all its seeming
harshness, in fact helps people develop themselves. Thus it is a helpful system, much moreso
that the welfare state concept, for example, and far more than slavery,
feudalism and other systems that have been used in the near and distant past in
many civilizations.
The
more that each personÕs activities are pre-determined or controlled by laws,
rules, regulations, prohibitions or mandates, the less each person is able to
exercise moral judgment and the less he or she is responsible for behavior. As a result, freedom is an absolute requirement for moral
behavior and development.
Home * Hair
Analysis * Saunas * Books * Articles
Detoxification Protocols * Courses * About Dr.
Wilson